Want to add: Gordon Fie, conservative, highly respected evangelical. New International commentary on 1 Corinthians…
"The homosexuality the New Testament opposes is the pederasty of the Greco-Roman culture; the attitudes toward pederasty and, in part, the language used to oppose it are informed by the Jewish background."
Robin Scroggs, Professor of Biblical Theology,
Union Theological Seminary, New York City.
"One cannot be absolutely certain that the two key words in I Corinthians 6:9 are meant as references to male homosexual behavior."
Victor Paul Furnish, Professor of New Testament,
Perkins School of Theology, Dallas.
"The strongest New Testament argument against homosexual activity is intrinsically immoral has been derived traditionally from Romans 1:26, where this activity is indicated as para physin. The normal English translation for this has been 'against nature.' Two interpretations can be justified concerning what Paul meant by the phrase. It could refer to the individual pagan, who goes beyond his own sexual appetites in order to indulge in new sexual pleasure. The second possibility is that physis refers to the 'nature' of the chosen people who were forbidden by Levitical law to have homosexual relations."
John J. McNeill, Adjunct Professor of Psychology,
Union Theological Seminary, New York City.
"A close reading of Paul's discussion of homosexual acts in Romans 1 does not support the common modern interpretation of the passage. Paul did not deny the existence of a distinction between clean and unclean and even assumed that Jewish Christians would continue to observe the purity code. He refrained. However, from identifying physical impurity with sin or demanding that Gentiles adhere to that code."
William Countryman, Professor of New Testament,
Church Divinity School of Pacific, Berkeley.
"The Hebrew word 'toevah,' here translated 'abomination,' does not usually signify something intrinsically evil, like rape or theft (discussed elsewhere in Leviticus), but something which is ritually unclean for Jews, like eating pork or engaging in intercourse during menstruation, both of which are prohibited in these same chapters."
John Boswell, Professor of History,
Yale University, New Haven.
About Me
Categories
- about gay (11)
- bible (9)
- clip (16)
- fun (7)
- gay themed (19)
- hot guy (4)
- music (3)
- must see (11)
- news (1)
- pictures (2)
- short clip (6)
- sweet (1)
- what to (1)
- what to see (8)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(41)
-
▼
July
(24)
- Breakfast
- What to see!
- What to see!
- What to see!
- Boys be ware
- You dropped the soap
- What to see!
- Thinking
- After Sex - Neil & Bob
- After Sex - Freddy & Jay
- Nikita l-a batut pe transsexualul Naomi
- Parody Fight Club
- Danny Bonaduce - Soup
- Gay America
- (Mad TV) Corky & The Juice Pigs - Only Gay Eskimo
- Homosexuality; Not A Sin, Not A Sickness
- Not a Sin, Not a Sickness
- Changing Interpretations…the Impact of Study
- What The Bible Does and Does Not Say
- The Holiness Code – Scripture Study
- The New Testament – Scripture Study
- Scripture Study Conclusion…No Law Against Love
- Insights from Other Bible Scholars
- Helpful Reading:
-
▼
July
(24)
7:26 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment